"Friendship"

We have a great deal more kindness than is ever spoken. Maugre all the selfishness that chills like east winds the world, the whole human family is bathed with an element of love like a fine ether. How many persons we meet in houses, whom we scarcely speak to, whom yet we honor, and who honor us! How many we see in the street, or sit with in church, whom, though silently, we warmly rejoice to be with! Read the language of these wandering eye-beams. The heart knoweth.

The effect of the indulgence of this human affection is a certain cordial exhilaration. In poetry and in common speech, the emotions of benevolence and complacency which are felt towards others are likened to the material effects of fire; so swift, or much more swift, more active, more cheering, are these fine inward irradiations. From the highest degree of passionate love to the lowest degree of good-will, they make the sweetness of life.

Our intellectual and active powers increase with our affection. The scholar sits down to write, and all his years of meditation do not furnish him with one good thought or happy expression; but it is necessary to write a letter to a friend,—and forthwith troops of gentle thoughts invest themselves, on every hand, with chosen words. See, in any house where virtue and self-respect abide, the palpitation which the approach of a stranger causes. A commended stranger is expected and announced, and an uneasiness betwixt pleasure and pain invades all the hearts of a household. His arrival almost brings fear to the good hearts that would welcome him. The house is dusted, all things fly into their places, the old coat is exchanged for the new, and they must get up a dinner if they can. Of a commended stranger, only the good report is told by others, only the good and new is heard by us. He stands to us for humanity. He is what we wish. Having imagined and invested him, we ask how we should stand related in conversation and action with such a man, and are uneasy with fear. The same idea exalts conversation with him. We talk better than we are wont. We have the nimblest fancy, a richer memory, and our dumb devil has taken leave for the time. For long hours we can continue a series of sincere, graceful, rich communications, drawn from the oldest, secretest experience, so that they who sit by, of our own kinsfolk and acquaintance, shall feel a lively surprise at our unusual powers. But as soon as the stranger begins to intrude his partialities, his definitions, his defects, into the conversation, it is all over. He has heard the first, the last and best he will ever hear from us. He is no stranger now. Vulgarity, ignorance, misapprehension are old acquaintances. Now, when he comes, he may get the order, the dress and the dinner,—but the throbbing of the heart and the communications of the soul, no more.

What is so pleasant as these jets of affection which make a young world for me again? What so delicious as a just and firm encounter of two, in a thought, in a feeling? How beautiful, on their approach to this beating heart, the steps and forms of the gifted and the true! The moment we indulge our affections, the earth is metamorphosed; there is no winter and no night; all tragedies, all ennuis vanish,—all duties even; nothing fills the proceeding eternity but the forms all radiant of beloved persons. Let the soul be assured that somewhere in the universe it should rejoin its friend, and it would be content and cheerful alone for a thousand years.

I awoke this morning with devout thanksgiving for my friends, the old and the new. Shall I not call God the Beautiful, who daily showeth himself so to me in his gifts? I chide society, I embrace solitude, and yet I am not so ungrateful as not to see the wise, the lovely and the noble-minded, as from time to time they pass my gate. Who hears me, who understands me, becomes mine,—a possession for all time. Nor is Nature so poor but she gives me this joy several times, and thus we weave social threads of our own, a new web of relations; and, as many thoughts in succession substantiate themselves, we shall by and by stand in a new world of our own creation, and no longer strangers and pilgrims in a traditionary globe. My friends have come to me unsought. The great God gave them to me. By oldest right, by the divine affinity of virtue with itself, I find them, or rather not I but the Deity in me and in them derides and cancels the thick walls of individual character, relation, age, sex, circumstance, at which he usually connives, and now makes many one. High thanks I owe you, excellent lovers, who carry out the world for me to new and noble depths, and enlarge the meaning of all my thoughts. These are new poetry of the first Bard,—poetry without stop,—hymn, ode and epic, poetry still flowing, Apollo and the Muses chanting still. Will these too separate themselves from me again, or some of them? I know not, but I fear it not; for my relation to them is so pure, that we hold by simple affinity, and the Genius of my life being thus social, the same affinity will exert its energy on whomsoever is as noble as these men and women, wherever I may be.

I confess to an extreme tenderness of nature on this point. It is almost dangerous to me to "crush the sweet poison of misused wine" of the affections. A new person is to me a great event and hinders me from sleep. I have often had fine fancies about persons which have given me delicious hours; but the joy ends in the day; it yields no fruit. Thought is not born of it; my action is very little modified. I must feel pride in my friend's accomplishments as if they were mine, and a property in his virtues. I feel as warmly when he is praised, as the lover when he hears applause of his engaged maiden. We over-estimate the conscience of our friend. His goodness seems better than our goodness, his nature finer, his temptations less. Every thing that is his,—his name, his form, his dress, books and instruments,—fancy enhances. Our own thought sounds new and larger from his mouth.

Yet the systole and diastole of the heart are not without their analogy in the ebb and flow of love. Friendship, like the immortality of the soul, is too good to be believed. The lover, beholding his maiden, half knows that she is not verily that which he worships; and in the golden hour of friendship we are surprised with shades of suspicion and unbelief. We doubt that we bestow on our hero the virtues in which he shines, and afterwards worship the form to which we have ascribed this divine inhabitation. In strictness, the soul does not respect men as it respects itself. In strict science all persons underlie the same condition of an infinite remoteness. Shall we fear to cool our love by mining for the metaphysical foundation of this Elysian temple? Shall I not be as real as the things I see? If I am, I shall not fear to know them for what they are. Their essence is not less beautiful than their appearance, though it needs finer organs for its apprehension. The root of the plant is not unsightly to science, though for chaplets and festoons we cut the stem short. And I must hazard the production of the bald fact amidst these pleasing reveries, though it should prove an Egyptian skull at our banquet. A man who stands united with his thought conceives magnificently of himself. He is conscious of a universal success, even though bought by uniform particular failures. No advantages, no powers, no gold or force, can be any match for him. I cannot choose but rely on my own poverty more than on your wealth. I cannot make your consciousness tantamount to mine. Only the star dazzles; the planet has a faint, moon-like ray. I hear what you say of the admirable parts and tried temper of the party you praise, but I see well that for all his purple cloaks I shall not like him, unless he is at last a poor Greek like me. I cannot deny it, O friend, that the vast shadow of the Phenomenal includes thee also in its pied and painted immensity,—thee also, compared with whom all else is shadow. Thou art not Being, as Truth is, as Justice is,—thou art not my soul, but a picture and effigy of that. Thou hast come to me lately, and already thou art seizing thy hat and cloak. Is it not that the soul puts forth friends as the tree puts forth leaves, and presently, by the germination of new buds, extrudes the old leaf? The law of nature is alternation for evermore. Each electrical state superinduces the opposite. The soul environs itself with friends that it may enter into a grander self-acquaintance or solitude; and it goes alone for a season, that it may exalt its conversation or society. This method betrays itself along the whole history of our personal relations. The instinct of affection revives the hope of union with our mates, and the returning sense of insulation recalls us from the chase. Thus every man passes his life in the search after friendship, and if he should record his true sentiment, he might write a letter like this to each new candidate for his love:—

DEAR FRIEND,

If I was sure of thee, sure of thy capacity, sure to match my mood with thine, I should never think again of trifles in relation to thy comings and goings. I am not very wise; my moods are quite attainable, and I respect thy genius; it is to me as yet unfathomed; yet dare I not presume in thee a perfect intelligence of me, and so thou art to me a delicious torment. Thine ever, or never.

Yet these uneasy pleasures and fine pains are for curiosity and not for life. They are not to be indulged. This is to weave cobweb, and not cloth. Our friendships hurry to short and poor conclusions, because we have made them a texture of wine and dreams, instead of the tough fibre of the human heart. The laws of friendship are austere and eternal, of one web with the laws of nature and of morals. But we have aimed at a swift and petty benefit, to suck a sudden sweetness. We snatch at the slowest fruit in the whole garden of God, which many summers and many winters must ripen. We seek our friend not sacredly, but with an adulterate passion which would appropriate him to ourselves. In vain. We are armed all over with subtle antagonisms, which, as soon as we meet, begin to play, and translate all poetry into stale prose. Almost all people descend to meet. All association must be a compromise, and, what is worst, the very flower and aroma of the flower of each of the beautiful natures disappears as they approach each other. What a perpetual disappointment is actual society, even of the virtuous and gifted! After interviews have been compassed with long foresight we must be tormented presently by baffled blows, by sudden, unseasonable apathies, by epilepsies of wit and of animal spirits, in the heyday of friendship and thought. Our faculties do not play us true, and both parties are relieved by solitude.

I ought to be equal to every relation. It makes no difference how many friends I have and what content I can find in conversing with each, if there be one to whom I am not equal. If I have shrunk unequal from one contest, the joy I find in all the rest becomes mean and cowardly. I should hate myself, if then I made my other friends my asylum:—

          "The valiant warrior famoused for fight,
           After a hundred victories, once foiled,
           Is from the book of honor razed quite,
           And all the rest forgot for which he toiled."

Our impatience is thus sharply rebuked. Bashfulness and apathy are a tough husk in which a delicate organization is protected from premature ripening. It would be lost if it knew itself before any of the best souls were yet ripe enough to know and own it. Respect the naturlangsamkeit which hardens the ruby in a million years, and works in duration in which Alps and Andes come and go as rainbows. The good spirit of our life has no heaven which is the price of rashness. Love, which is the essence of God, is not for levity, but for the total worth of man. Let us not have this childish luxury in our regards, but the austerest worth; let us approach our friend with an audacious trust in the truth of his heart, in the breadth, impossible to be overturned, of his foundations.

The attractions of this subject are not to be resisted, and I leave, for the time, all account of subordinate social benefit, to speak of that select and sacred relation which is a kind of absolute, and which even leaves the language of love suspicious and common, so much is this purer, and nothing is so much divine.

I do not wish to treat friendships daintily, but with roughest courage. When they are real, they are not glass threads or frostwork, but the solidest thing we know. For now, after so many ages of experience, what do we know of nature or of ourselves? Not one step has man taken toward the solution of the problem of his destiny. In one condemnation of folly stand the whole universe of men. But the sweet sincerity of joy and peace which I draw from this alliance with my brother's soul is the nut itself whereof all nature and all thought is but the husk and shell. Happy is the house that shelters a friend! It might well be built, like a festal bower or arch, to entertain him a single day. Happier, if he know the solemnity of that relation and honor its law! He who offers himself a candidate for that covenant comes up, like an Olympian, to the great games where the first-born of the world are the competitors. He proposes himself for contests where Time, Want, Danger, are in the lists, and he alone is victor who has truth enough in his constitution to preserve the delicacy of his beauty from the wear and tear of all these. The gifts of fortune may be present or absent, but all the speed in that contest depends on intrinsic nobleness and the contempt of trifles. There are two elements that go to the composition of friendship, each so sovereign that I can detect no superiority in either, no reason why either should be first named. One is truth. A friend is a person with whom I may be sincere. Before him I may think aloud. I am arrived at last in the presence of a man so real and equal that I may drop even those undermost garments of dissimulation, courtesy, and second thought, which men never put off, and may deal with him with the simplicity and wholeness with which one chemical atom meets another. Sincerity is the luxury allowed, like diadems and authority, only to the highest rank; that being permitted to speak truth, as having none above it to court or conform unto. Every man alone is sincere. At the entrance of a second person, hypocrisy begins. We parry and fend the approach of our fellow-man by compliments, by gossip, by amusements, by affairs. We cover up our thought from him under a hundred folds. I knew a man who under a certain religious frenzy cast off this drapery, and omitting all compliment and commonplace, spoke to the conscience of every person he encountered, and that with great insight and beauty. At first he was resisted, and all men agreed he was mad. But persisting—as indeed he could not help doing—for some time in this course, he attained to the advantage of bringing every man of his acquaintance into true relations with him. No man would think of speaking falsely with him, or of putting him off with any chat of markets or reading-rooms. But every man was constrained by so much sincerity to the like plaindealing, and what love of nature, what poetry, what symbol of truth he had, he did certainly show him. But to most of us society shows not its face and eye, but its side and its back. To stand in true relations with men in a false age is worth a fit of insanity, is it not? We can seldom go erect. Almost every man we meet requires some civility,—requires to be humored; he has some fame, some talent, some whim of religion or philanthropy in his head that is not to be questioned, and which spoils all conversation with him. But a friend is a sane man who exercises not my ingenuity, but me. My friend gives me entertainment without requiring any stipulation on my part. A friend therefore is a sort of paradox in nature. I who alone am, I who see nothing in nature whose existence I can affirm with equal evidence to my own, behold now the semblance of my being, in all its height, variety, and curiosity, reiterated in a foreign form; so that a friend may well be reckoned the masterpiece of nature.

The other element of friendship is tenderness. We are holden to men by every sort of tie, by blood, by pride, by fear, by hope, by lucre, by lust, by hate, by admiration, by every circumstance and badge and trifle,—but we can scarce believe that so much character can subsist in another as to draw us by love. Can another be so blessed and we so pure that we can offer him tenderness? When a man becomes dear to me I have touched the goal of fortune. I find very little written directly to the heart of this matter in books. And yet I have one text which I cannot choose but remember. My author says,—"I offer myself faintly and bluntly to those whose I effectually am, and tender myself least to him to whom I am the most devoted." I wish that friendship should have feet, as well as eyes and eloquence. It must plant itself on the ground, before it vaults over the moon. I wish it to be a little of a citizen, before it is quite a cherub. We chide the citizen because he makes love a commodity. It is an exchange of gifts, of useful loans; it is good neighborhood; it watches with the sick; it holds the pall at the funeral; and quite loses sight of the delicacies and nobility of the relation. But though we cannot find the god under this disguise of a sutler, yet on the other hand we cannot forgive the poet if he spins his thread too fine and does not substantiate his romance by the municipal virtues of justice, punctuality, fidelity and pity. I hate the prostitution of the name of friendship to signify modish and worldly alliances. I much prefer the company of ploughboys and tin-peddlers to the silken and perfumed amity which celebrates its days of encounter by a frivolous display, by rides in a curricle and dinners at the best taverns. The end of friendship is a commerce the most strict and homely that can be joined; more strict than any of which we have experience. It is for aid and comfort through all the relations and passages of life and death. It is fit for serene days and graceful gifts and country rambles, but also for rough roads and hard fare, shipwreck, poverty, and persecution. It keeps company with the sallies of the wit and the trances of religion. We are to dignify to each other the daily needs and offices of man's life, and embellish it by courage, wisdom and unity. It should never fall into something usual and settled, but should be alert and inventive and add rhyme and reason to what was drudgery.

Friendship may be said to require natures so rare and costly, each so well tempered and so happily adapted, and withal so circumstanced (for even in that particular, a poet says, love demands that the parties be altogether paired), that its satisfaction can very seldom be assured. It cannot subsist in its perfection, say some of those who are learned in this warm lore of the heart, betwixt more than two. I am not quite so strict in my terms, perhaps because I have never known so high a fellowship as others. I please my imagination more with a circle of godlike men and women variously related to each other and between whom subsists a lofty intelligence. But I find this law of one to one peremptory for conversation, which is the practice and consummation of friendship. Do not mix waters too much. The best mix as ill as good and bad. You shall have very useful and cheering discourse at several times with two several men, but let all three of you come together and you shall not have one new and hearty word. Two may talk and one may hear, but three cannot take part in a conversation of the most sincere and searching sort. In good company there is never such discourse between two, across the table, as takes place when you leave them alone. In good company the individuals merge their egotism into a social soul exactly co-extensive with the several consciousnesses there present. No partialities of friend to friend, no fondnesses of brother to sister, of wife to husband, are there pertinent, but quite otherwise. Only he may then speak who can sail on the common thought of the party, and not poorly limited to his own. Now this convention, which good sense demands, destroys the high freedom of great conversation, which requires an absolute running of two souls into one.

No two men but being left alone with each other enter into simpler relations. Yet it is affinity that determines which two shall converse. Unrelated men give little joy to each other, will never suspect the latent powers of each. We talk sometimes of a great talent for conversation, as if it were a permanent property in some individuals. Conversation is an evanescent relation,—no more. A man is reputed to have thought and eloquence; he cannot, for all that, say a word to his cousin or his uncle. They accuse his silence with as much reason as they would blame the insignificance of a dial in the shade. In the sun it will mark the hour. Among those who enjoy his thought he will regain his tongue.

Friendship requires that rare mean betwixt likeness and unlikeness that piques each with the presence of power and of consent in the other party. Let me be alone to the end of the world, rather than that my friend should overstep, by a word or a look, his real sympathy. I am equally balked by antagonism and by compliance. Let him not cease an instant to be himself. The only joy I have in his being mine, is that the not mine is mine. I hate, where I looked for a manly furtherance, or at least a manly resistance, to find a mush of concession. Better be a nettle in the side of your friend than his echo. The condition which high friendship demands is ability to do without it. That high office requires great and sublime parts. There must be very two, before there can be very one. Let it be an alliance of two large, formidable natures, mutually beheld, mutually feared, before yet they recognize the deep identity which, beneath these disparities, unites them.

He only is fit for this society who is magnanimous; who is sure that greatness and goodness are always economy; who is not swift to intermeddle with his fortunes. Let him not intermeddle with this. Leave to the diamond its ages to grow, nor expect to accelerate the births of the eternal. Friendship demands a religious treatment. We talk of choosing our friends, but friends are self-elected. Reverence is a great part of it. Treat your friend as a spectacle. Of course he has merits that are not yours, and that you cannot honor if you must needs hold him close to your person. Stand aside; give those merits room; let them mount and expand. Are you the friend of your friend's buttons, or of his thought? To a great heart he will still be a stranger in a thousand particulars, that he may come near in the holiest ground. Leave it to girls and boys to regard a friend as property, and to suck a short and all-confounding pleasure, instead of the noblest benefit.

Let us buy our entrance to this guild by a long probation. Why should we desecrate noble and beautiful souls by intruding on them? Why insist on rash personal relations with your friend? Why go to his house, or know his mother and brother and sisters? Why be visited by him at your own? Are these things material to our covenant? Leave this touching and clawing. Let him be to me a spirit. A message, a thought, a sincerity, a glance from him, I want, but not news, nor pottage. I can get politics and chat and neighborly conveniences from cheaper companions. Should not the society of my friend be to me poetic, pure, universal and great as nature itself? Ought I to feel that our tie is profane in comparison with yonder bar of cloud that sleeps on the horizon, or that clump of waving grass that divides the brook? Let us not vilify, but raise it to that standard. That great defying eye, that scornful beauty of his mien and action, do not pique yourself on reducing, but rather fortify and enhance. Worship his superiorities; wish him not less by a thought, but hoard and tell them all. Guard him as thy counterpart. Let him be to thee for ever a sort of beautiful enemy, untamable, devoutly revered, and not a trivial conveniency to be soon outgrown and cast aside. The hues of the opal, the light of the diamond, are not to be seen if the eye is too near. To my friend I write a letter and from him I receive a letter. That seems to you a little. It suffices me. It is a spiritual gift worthy of him to give and of me to receive. It profanes nobody. In these warm lines the heart will trust itself, as it will not to the tongue, and pour out the prophecy of a godlier existence than all the annals of heroism have yet made good.

Respect so far the holy laws of this fellowship as not to prejudice its perfect flower by your impatience for its opening. We must be our own before we can be another's. There is at least this satisfaction in crime, according to the Latin proverb;—you can speak to your accomplice on even terms. Crimen quos inquinat, aequat. To those whom we admire and love, at first we cannot. Yet the least defect of self-possession vitiates, in my judgment, the entire relation. There can never be deep peace between two spirits, never mutual respect, until in their dialogue each stands for the whole world.

What is so great as friendship, let us carry with what grandeur of spirit we can. Let us be silent,—so we may hear the whisper of the gods. Let us not interfere. Who set you to cast about what you should say to the select souls, or how to say any thing to such? No matter how ingenious, no matter how graceful and bland. There are innumerable degrees of folly and wisdom, and for you to say aught is to be frivolous. Wait, and thy heart shall speak. Wait until the necessary and everlasting overpowers you, until day and night avail themselves of your lips. The only reward of virtue is virtue; the only way to have a friend is to be one. You shall not come nearer a man by getting into his house. If unlike, his soul only flees the faster from you, and you shall never catch a true glance of his eye. We see the noble afar off and they repel us; why should we intrude? Late,—very late,—we perceive that no arrangements, no introductions, no consuetudes or habits of society would be of any avail to establish us in such relations with them as we desire,—but solely the uprise of nature in us to the same degree it is in them; then shall we meet as water with water; and if we should not meet them then, we shall not want them, for we are already they. In the last analysis, love is only the reflection of a man's own worthiness from other men. Men have sometimes exchanged names with their friends, as if they would signify that in their friend each loved his own soul.

The higher the style we demand of friendship, of course the less easy to establish it with flesh and blood. We walk alone in the world. Friends such as we desire are dreams and fables. But a sublime hope cheers ever the faithful heart, that elsewhere, in other regions of the universal power, souls are now acting, enduring, and daring, which can love us and which we can love. We may congratulate ourselves that the period of nonage, of follies, of blunders and of shame, is passed in solitude, and when we are finished men we shall grasp heroic hands in heroic hands. Only be admonished by what you already see, not to strike leagues of friendship with cheap persons, where no friendship can be. Our impatience betrays us into rash and foolish alliances which no god attends. By persisting in your path, though you forfeit the little you gain the great. You demonstrate yourself, so as to put yourself out of the reach of false relations, and you draw to you the first-born of the world,—those rare pilgrims whereof only one or two wander in nature at once, and before whom the vulgar great show as spectres and shadows merely.

It is foolish to be afraid of making our ties too spiritual, as if so we could lose any genuine love. Whatever correction of our popular views we make from insight, nature will be sure to bear us out in, and though it seem to rob us of some joy, will repay us with a greater. Let us feel if we will the absolute insulation of man. We are sure that we have all in us. We go to Europe, or we pursue persons, or we read books, in the instinctive faith that these will call it out and reveal us to ourselves. Beggars all. The persons are such as we; the Europe, an old faded garment of dead persons; the books, their ghosts. Let us drop this idolatry. Let us give over this mendicancy. Let us even bid our dearest friends farewell, and defy them, saying, 'Who are you? Unhand me: I will be dependent no more.' Ah! seest thou not, O brother, that thus we part only to meet again on a higher platform, and only be more each other's because we are more our own? A friend is Janus-faced; he looks to the past and the future. He is the child of all my foregoing hours, the prophet of those to come, and the harbinger of a greater friend.

I do then with my friends as I do with my books. I would have them where I can find them, but I seldom use them. We must have society on our own terms, and admit or exclude it on the slightest cause. I cannot afford to speak much with my friend. If he is great he makes me so great that I cannot descend to converse. In the great days, presentiments hover before me in the firmament. I ought then to dedicate myself to them. I go in that I may seize them, I go out that I may seize them. I fear only that I may lose them receding into the sky in which now they are only a patch of brighter light. Then, though I prize my friends, I cannot afford to talk with them and study their visions, lest I lose my own. It would indeed give me a certain household joy to quit this lofty seeking, this spiritual astronomy or search of stars, and come down to warm sympathies with you; but then I know well I shall mourn always the vanishing of my mighty gods. It is true, next week I shall have languid moods, when I can well afford to occupy myself with foreign objects; then I shall regret the lost literature of your mind, and wish you were by my side again. But if you come, perhaps you will fill my mind only with new visions; not with yourself but with your lustres, and I shall not be able any more than now to converse with you. So I will owe to my friends this evanescent intercourse. I will receive from them not what they have but what they are. They shall give me that which properly they cannot give, but which emanates from them. But they shall not hold me by any relations less subtile and pure. We will meet as though we met not, and part as though we parted not.

It has seemed to me lately more possible than I knew, to carry a friendship greatly, on one side, without due correspondence on the other. Why should I cumber myself with regrets that the receiver is not capacious? It never troubles the sun that some of his rays fall wide and vain into ungrateful space, and only a small part on the reflecting planet. Let your greatness educate the crude and cold companion. If he is unequal he will presently pass away; but thou art enlarged by thy own shining, and no longer a mate for frogs and worms, dost soar and burn with the gods of the empyrean. It is thought a disgrace to love unrequited. But the great will see that true love cannot be unrequited. True love transcends the unworthy object and dwells and broods on the eternal, and when the poor interposed mask crumbles, it is not sad, but feels rid of so much earth and feels its independency the surer. Yet these things may hardly be said without a sort of treachery to the relation. The essence of friendship is entireness, a total magnanimity and trust. It must not surmise or provide for infirmity. It treats its object as a god, that it may deify both.

Footnotes

  1. In the final sentences of the essay, Emerson highlights the sanctity of friendship as a way of “deify[ing] both” friends. When the “interposed mask crumbles,” an image of temporal earthliness, friends can find strength in their own self-sufficiency built out of friendship. Using diction like “eternal” and “transcends,” Emerson indicates that friendship surpasses earthly burdens and heightens individuals to god-like figures.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  2. Those who reciprocate one’s friendship are, in Emerson’s opinion, the “gods of the empyrean.” The word “empyrean” describes someone or something belonging to heaven. By comparing true friends with gods, Emerson states that friendship can transcend the temporal. As he states repeatedly throughout the essay, love and friendship are celestial and god-like.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  3. Emerson claims that like the sun, who casts his rays all over the universe but only a small portion reaches Earth, an individual can cast his greatness beyond an isolated realm. When a friend displays their greatness, those who do not accept it will disappear, while those who are “enlarged by thy own shining” will reciprocate that love and friendship.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  4. The notion of a friend being “Janus-faced” also suggests the two-sided dimensions of friendship. Duality persists in the tension between hostility and generosity as well as distance and closeness. Furthermore, Emerson claims that a friend may, like Janus, have a duplicitous, meaning deceptive, nature.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  5. This paragraph is replete with dichotomies, expressed in parallel structure: “I go in that I may seize them, I go out that I may seize them” and “We will meet as though we met not, as part as though we parted not.” This diction creates a sense of ambivalence. On the one hand, Emerson imagines a friendship where he treats his friends as distant gods and finds the ultimate friend within himself; on the other, he imagines that his friends were by his “side again.” At once desiring closeness and distance, Emerson speaks to the multiple facets of friendship, which he describes as “evanescent intercourse.”

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  6. In these final two paragraphs, Emerson imagines a friendship devoid of friends. Through simile, Emerson likens friends to books, suggesting that he looks to them but rarely uses them. In an ideal friendship, Emerson envisions an individual’s search for autonomy. Once an individual has grasped a sense of their own self, he no longer requires friendship from others because he has found a friend in himself.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  7. “Janus,” the Roman god of gates, doorways, beginnings, and endings, is depicted as having two faces looking in opposite directions. Here, Emerson uses the phrase “Janus-faced” to indicate that a friend looks back to the past and forward to the future. Throughout this paragraph, Emerson provides a revolutionary stance on friendship. He decries the superficiality of European idolatry and urges readers to drop shallow friendships. In so doing, he suggests that we will meet true friends on a more spiritual, transcendental level, when we unite with them on a “higher platform” where friends persist timelessly.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  8. In this paragraph, Emerson summarizes his belief that we are ultimately “alone in the world.” Friends, he writes, are “dreams and fables.” Finding friends is akin to finding the “first-born of the world,” of which there are “only one or two [who] wander in nature at once.” The notion of the “first-born,” perhaps referring to Adam and Eve, suggests an Edenic purity and impossibility.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  9. Here, Emerson uses a simile to state that when two people unite, their relationship should be like water meeting with water. This image of water suggests a fluid and effortless merging between two identical entities. In this context, the simile suggests the merging of two independent and self-possessed individuals who love themselves as they love the other.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  10. The word “consuetudes,” from the Latin consuetudo, refers to a custom. Emerson claims that no custom of society will help implement a friendship. Rather, friends become united when their natures rise to the “same degree.” In other words, friendship cannot be enforced by societal norms but arises quietly and naturally when two people connect on a spiritual level.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  11. Through this figurative phrase, Emerson intimates the sacrosanct nature of friendship. He urges readers to allow friendship to run its course or to develop as naturally as possible, without interference. Friends must not act too forward; instead they should “be silent” in order to hear “the whisper of the gods.” Emerson doesn’t necessarily mean that friends should not talk; rather, he states that friendship is a quiet, reflective process, one of holy and sacred importance and worthy of reflection.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  12. The verb “vitiates” means to make defective. Here, Emerson claims that the inability to develop independently undermines “the entire relation” of the friendship. The sustainability of friendship hinges on the two friends' abilities to form their own spirits before they devote themselves to one another.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  13. Translated from Latin, this phrase means “those whom crime pollutes, it makes equal.” By drawing on this phrase, Emerson claims that friends must be independent and self-possessed before they can enter into meaningful friendship.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  14. Equating once more the laws of friendship with the laws of nature, or naturlangsamkeit, Emerson urges readers to treat friendship as the “perfect flower” that takes time to bloom. Further, he builds of this idea by claiming that patience is not only vital in friendships, but also it is also vital in developing oneself. Friendship cannot take root without two people standing “for the whole world,” having developed their own characters and autonomy.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  15. Through this metaphor, Emerson states the importance of estrangement in a friendship. One must never become too attached to another, because then the “hues of the opal” and the “light of the diamond” can no longer be seen. In other words, friends should revere one another with slight detachment. If they become too intimate, then a friend’s character and personality may be obscured by another’s.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  16. Emerson writes that a friend should be a “beautiful enemy.” The first word demonstrates something attractive, while the latter references someone who is an adversary. The contrast between the positive attributes of the first word against the negative attributes of the second illustrates this oxymoron. While two friends must regard each other with reverence and praise, they must simultaneously see the other as a rival. Emerson’s pupil, Henry David Thoreau, echoes this sentiment in a January 1850 journal entry in which he writes: “My so-called friend comes near to being my greatest enemy.” Both he and Emerson understood that true friendship originated out of a union of two dichotomies: antipathy and affinity.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  17. In an essay entitled “Nature”, written five years before “Friendship,” Emerson asserts his belief in the incredible unity of nature and humans: “Yet it is certain that the power to produce this delight, does not reside in nature, but in man, or in a harmony of both.” Returning now to the theme of nature, Emerson equates friendship to the “harmony” and “delight” nature induces. To Emerson, friendship is not for sharing gossip or small talk; rather, it is a medium to experience poetry and purity. In the rhetorical question he poses, Emerson contemplates whether friendship is akin to the greatness of nature, encapsulated in a whimsical cloud or a piece of grass. If not, he claims, then it should be one’s duty to elevate a friendship to a more spiritual and universal “standard.”

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  18. Referring to the biblical story in Genesis 25 about the stew for which Esau sold his birthright to younger brother Jacob, the term “pottage” describes an exchange of something trivial for something of greater value. With this allusion, Emerson states that from a friendship, he would rather receive something insignificant, such as “a message, a thought, a sincerity,” instead of something superficial of greater value.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  19. Here, Emerson employs hypophora, whereby following the series of rhetorical questions, he provides answers. His solution, to stay distant from the intimacies of friendship, is elucidated in imperative language, with commands such as “leave,” “worship,” “guard,” and “let him.” With the use of commands, Emerson asserts his conviction that friendship is best maintained when infused with estrangement.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  20. Through a series of five rhetorical questions, Emerson asks in variation, Why become too acquainted with a friend? The rhetorical questioning strategy he employs indicates that he thinks such behavior is inane. In the following lines, he offers a solution of estrangement and detachment.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  21. During the medieval period, the word “guild” referred to an association of merchants and craftsmen. More recently, it refers to a group of people with shared interests. By stating that we must pay to enter this “guild” only after a long probation, Emerson clarifies that friendship is an exclusive relationship; one that necessitates a period of testing and observance.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  22. A “spectacle” is a show that is unusual or entertaining. By stating that one must treat a friend as a “spectacle,” Emerson intimates that friends are not property, as a child might believe, but an entity to admire and respect from a slightly distanced and estranged perspective.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  23. Emerson returns again to to the notion of naturlangsamkeit, or the time-consuming, deliberate ways in which nature changes. The metaphor of diamonds taking eons to grow furthers the claim that only the patient and even-tempered are capable of allowing friendships bloom. Those who are impetuous and rash will never make the same sort of long-lasting, meaningful connections.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  24. Someone who is “magnanimous” is someone with an exceptional sense of generosity and benevolence. Emerson claims that only those who are kind and good-hearted can expect to enter into sincere friendships because only those have the ability to approach friendship with the “religious treatment” and sacredness it needs to develop.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  25. Emerson encapsulates the paradox of friendship: on one hand, it is an “alliance” or bond; on the other, it is comprised of two independent, strong-willed “natures,” here described as one’s inherent character. As Emerson writes earlier, a friendship is a “paradox in nature,” composed of two seemingly incompatible parts—unity and autonomy.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  26. Emerson provides a metaphor to explain that two members united in friendship must each have their own personalities and convictions. A friend must be autonomous and independent, like a “nettle” or a prickly plant with stinging hair, instead of imitative, like an “echo.” Friends must never concede themselves for the other, nor should they allow the other to be someone he is not.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  27. In this paragraph, Emerson fully concedes to the dichotomies of friendship. Echoing one of Aristotle’s proverbs, “O my friends, there is no friend,” he writes that the beauty of having a friend is knowing that the other person is “not mine,” or in other words, entirely himself. A friendship is strong when the two individuals involved each retain their personalities and allow the other to be themselves as well.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  28. Holding a conversation with a relative, according to Emerson, is as useless and insignificant as “a dial in the shade.” This metaphor suggests that only through meaningful conversations with distant, like minded friends, someone can “regain his tongue” and converse productively.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  29. The adjective “evanescent” refers to something that vanishes like vapor. In this context, Emerson uses this word to describe conversation, which he says is malleable and fleeting. Conversation is not an acquired skill; rather, it is an “evanescent relation,” meaning that the course of the conversation hinges on who is speaking.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  30. Through this nature-based metaphor, Emerson encourages readers not to disturb the laws of friendship by holding conversations with more than one other person. To him, three or more people holding a conversation does not lend itself to sincere dialogue.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  31. In the final line of this paragraph, Emerson states that friendships should be revitalizing, new, and never something that falls into “drudgery,” meaning dull or fatiguing work. Friendships should uplift and heighten one’s daily experiences by “embellish[ing] it by courage, wisdom and unity.”

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  32. With the use of anaphora, repeating “It is” at the beginning of each sentence, Emerson states the various ways in which friendship can serve as a comforting presence. It helps those during “rough roads” and during “serene days,” as well as serving as a form of entertainment against boredom through sallies, or quips.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  33. Through this analogy, Emerson criticizes the poet who writes about romance and friendship without rooting themselves in reality. By spinning “his thread too fine,” the poet writes about romance with a saccharine touch. Emerson claims that similar to how the divine cannot be found with the sutler, nor can it be found with the poet who makes superficial content.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  34. The word “sutler,” which comes from the Dutch word soetelen, meaning to perform lowly tasks, refers to a salesperson who makes a living by following a troop and selling goods to soldiers.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  35. Emerson claims that friendship must be rooted in all parts of society, including the political and social dimension. Friendship, when planted “on the ground,” serves as an “exchange of gifts,” “a good neighborhood,” and watcher of the sick. When friendship becomes an integral part of society, it can foster positive relationships between individuals on a personal and political level.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  36. Here, Emerson alludes to a quote from Michel Eyquem de Montaigne (1533–1592), a philosopher and writer of the French Renaissance. In this quote, Montaigne describes the peculiarity of friendship: with those whom he is close, he offers himself “faintly and bluntly;” while with those he is distant, he offers his most devoted self.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  37. The noun “lucre” means monetary gain. This and the repetition “by” when listing the damaging ways faux friendships develop emphasize Emerson’s claim that what differentiates the sacred from the superficial friendship is tenderness and pure love. Friendships which grow out of tenderness provide greater fortune than those which develop in the name of profit.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  38. Here, Emerson gets to the crux of his argument. Plainly put, a friend is a “paradox,” a contradiction, or a puzzle. Emerson sees himself as a lonely renegade—“I who alone am”—yet nevertheless, he still finds merit in forming strong bonds with others. These friends, although in different terrestrial shapes and forms, “behold… the semblance of [his] being,” as if Emerson himself were reincarnated in a different body. A friend, in Emerson’s opinion, is like a mirror to himself, and thus, a “masterpiece of nature.”

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  39. Emerson personifies society as a person prone to concealment. In so doing, he constructs an image of society that suggests a sense of dishonesty about its true nature.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  40. Through a sartorial metaphor, Emerson claims that good friendships foster sincerity, which allows one to drop the garments of concealment and pretense. This suggests that once these layers are removed, people may communicate with “simplicity and wholeness.” In the subsequent metaphor, Emerson builds on this notion by stating that dropping any pretenses allows us to meet face to face without any sort of interference, as when atoms unite.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  41. This terse sentence, composed of entirely monosyllabic words, creates a pause amid the otherwise meandering diction Emerson uses. The brevity of the phrase, along with the direct meaning it conveys, stands out in this paragraph, which emphasizes Emerson’s belief that one of the main tenets of a strong friendship is being able to tell the truth.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  42. The word “bower” describes a walkway covered in trees and vines. Emerson claims that a house built of trees and vines might “entertain [a friend] for a single day”; however, a house built on “solemnity” and respect makes for the most successful infrastructure for maintaining strong bonds.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  43. In this section of his essay, Emerson exclaims triumphantly, “Happy is the house that shelters a friend!” Inserting this pithy interjection highlights the importance of the phrase, which intimates that those who are happiest are those who cultivate relationships that combine geniality with respect.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  44. Emerson approaches friendship from a contradictory perspective. To him, friendship is oxymoronic; it is both “delicate” and “solid.” He emphasizes that it must be formed with the utmost respect, but once formed, it is not like the dainty, glass-like patterns of “frostwork.” Instead, once a friendship has formed, it should be as rigid as a diamond created by nature’s slow, unyielding process of growth.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  45. In an 1839 letter to Margaret Fuller, Emerson writes, “We are strangely impatient of the secular crystallizations of nature in cavern or in man, of that which Goethe distinguishes by the grand word naturlangsamkeit.” This German word, which denotes the slowness of nature, comes from Johann Wolfgang von Goethe’s Nachgelassene Werke: Zwoelfter Band. Here, Emerson employs the word to speak to the importance of patience in tending to friendships. Much like how it takes nature millions of years to harden diamonds, so too must friendships form. He urges readers to heed from rash and hasty friendships and to take advice from the ways in which nature slowly and cautiously evolves.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  46. The word “husk” refers to a dry outer shell of various seeds and fruit. In this metaphor, Emerson equates “bashfulness and apathy” to a tough husk, whereas friendship is associated with words like “delicate” and “premature.” The contrast between the coarseness of a husk and the fragility of an unripened bud demonstrates the extremities between these two polarities.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  47. Here, Emerson alludes to Shakespeare’s Sonnet 26, lines 9-12 in order to claim that one meaningful, productive friendship is greater than many unfulfilling ones. In Sonnet 26, an unnamed warrior loses his honor after one defeat, despite his hundreds of victories. For Emerson, one sour friendship is akin to a loss of honor because it demonstrates that his relationships have become “mean and cowardly.”

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  48. Emerson objects to how most people impetuously form friendships with whomever they meet. Phrases like “adulterate passion” illustrate how Emerson condemns those who do not seek friends “sacredly.” To him, friendship is a process one must take seriously. Here, Emerson employs a metaphor to show how friendships are a compromise—the closer flowers stand to one another, the more their aromas disappear. By comparing participants in a friendship to the aroma of flowers, Emerson claims that the admiration we bestow on new friends begins to fade as these friends become old acquaintances; we are less able to distinguish the “aroma” of a meaningful friend among others.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  49. With delicate natural imagery, Emerson suggests that friendships take time and patience to grow and mature. In this metaphor, he claims that we reach too soon for the “slow fruit.” Instead we should wait for the slow fruit to ripen, allowing the fruit time to grow and flourish, before we “snatch” it. Analogously, we should find favorable friends and tend to those friendships with the same care and patience as one waits for fruit to ripen.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  50. Through this metaphor, Emerson denounces the careless approach to choosing friends. He claims that friendships are so often unsuccessful because we take the laws of friendship so flippantly. The laws of friendship are not ephemeral and malleable like “a texture of wine and dreams”; instead they are made of the “tough fibre of the human heart.” This image suggests earthly, strong, and unbreakable bonds which stem from within ourselves.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  51. The writer mirrors the same hesitancy of the letter’s beginning at the end by writing, “Thine ever, or never,” or in other words, “Yours, or not yours.” To Emerson, friendship is about the dichotomy of yours and not yours, closeness and distance, and familiarity and reservedness. Friendship is volatile—a continuous process of oscillation and fluctuation.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  52. The oxymoronic phrase “delicious torment” exemplifies the conundrum of friendship. This phrase demonstrates the various emotions one feels within a friendship: on one hand, it is pleasant and desirable; on the other, it creates a sense of agony and torture. Combined, the two words add a third dimension to the meaning of friendship: there is delight in the torment. In other words, the joy of friendship stems from the suffering it causes.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  53. By inserting a hypothetical letter written to a friend, Emerson reveals the complicated nature of friendship. The subjunctive “if,” which opens the letter, followed by the repetition of the phrase “sure of” indicate the writer’s uncertainty about whether they should be friends and, if so, how to characterize their love.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  54. Through this simile, Emerson describes friendship as a continually evolving search. Just “as the tree puts forth leaves… by the germination of new buds,” so too do friends enter into each other’s lives and make their places within. As old leaves are thrust out when new ones grow, old friends depart and the process begins anew. By comparing the friendship-forming process with something he reveres above all else—nature—Emerson suggests that friendships are natural and innate.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  55. Emerson speaks of the friend as having a “vast shadow of the Phenomenal.” The former noun “shadow” suggests a sense of ephemerality and transience, while the latter “Phenomenal” suggests a sense of grandeur and remarkability. This language suggests that friendship, like a shadow, is something so profound as to be outside of oneself.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  56. Switching into second person, Emerson speaks directly to readers. The tone becomes accusatory as he states that readers’ “wealth” cannot compare to his “poverty,” because of his heightened “consciousness.” By comparing himself to a bright star, and the reader to a faint planet, he claims that intellectual strength is far greater than superficial or material wealth.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  57. Here, Emerson alludes to the short story “The Dinner of the Seven Wise Men” by first-century Greek scholar Plutarch. In the story, Egyptians place a skeleton at the dinner table in order to remind their guests “what they soon shall be” and to deter them from engaging in menacing behavior. Emerson uses this allusion metaphorically to show how he will present the Egyptian skeleton, or an unequivocal truth, to his readers.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  58. The adjective “Elysian” comes from the Greek word “Elysium,” or an area of the Greek underworld reserved for heroes. Here, the adjective refers to something that is heavenly. Through this rhetorical question, Emerson suggests that friendship is akin to an “Elysian,” or ideal, temple. He argues that we should not seek the fundamental structure of the temple of friendship in order to understand it for fear that our love might “cool.”

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  59. In this simile, Emerson compares the believability of true friendship to the supposed “immortality of the soul.” In so doing, Emerson makes clear his skepticism of the paradox of friendship. While Emerson looks to friendship fondly, he also issues a grave warning that friendship “is too good to be believed.” Continuing his lover-maiden metaphor, he explains that the lover cannot possibly know the whole truth about the maiden and instead, loves and venerates an imagined idolized version. To Emerson, the only way to prevent this unavoidable pitfall of friendship is to maintain distance from others.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  60. Continuing his use of love metaphors to characterize friendship, Emerson likens the movement of heart muscles—specifically the contraction or “systole,” which moves the blood out into the arteries, and the relaxation or “diastole,” which draws the blood inward—to the “ebb and flow of love.” In Emerson’s opinion, love and friendship are synonymous; his friends are akin to “excellent lovers.” However, friendships, like romantic relationships, are ever-evolving and change from day to day. At times, friends and lovers may be distant; at other times, they may be excessively sentimental.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  61. Through the use of this metaphor, Emerson explains the pitfalls of friendship. While in the moment, friendship may be euphoric, it is also fleeting. The danger of friendship occurs after this sense of delight subsides. When the day is over, the “fruits” of friendship do not flourish.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  62. In an allusion to line 47 of John Milton’s Comus (1637), Emerson likens the joy of friendship to a “sweet poison of misused wine.” The oxymoron “sweet poison” speaks to Emerson’s perspective that although friendship can become rapturous, it can also become excessive.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  63. As he praises his friends for allowing him to think more intellectually and more open-mindedly, Emerson alludes to “Apollo and the Muses.” According to ancient Greek mythology, Apollo is the god of the sun, poetry, light, music, and truth; the Muses are the nine goddesses of artistic inspiration. Emerson’s friendships and the social aspects of his life enabled his “Genius,” allowing him to think creatively, as if bestowed with divine inspiration.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  64. Although Emerson does not explicitly reference his personal friendships, here we get a sense of the friendships that enriched his life. Since Emerson claims that one person’s divinity seeks out the same in others, friendship-building eclipses any sort of physical limitations, including “individual character, relation, age, sex, circumstance.” In this fashion, with the help of an inward, divine guide, Emerson met some of his most respected friends—including fellow writer Margaret Fuller, and pupil Henry David Thoreau, who was fourteen years his junior.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  65. Another essay published in the same compendium, Emerson’s “Self-Reliance”, outlines his transcendentalist perspective, which praises independent thought over collective pressures: “It is easy in the world to live after the world's opinion; it is easy in solitude to live after our own; but the great man is he who in the midst of the crowd keeps with perfect sweetness the independence of solitude.” In “Friendship,” Emerson echoes and builds upon the same beliefs. While he highly values solitude, he also sees the merit in interacting with like-minded, intellectually-inclined people.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  66. The word “ennuis,” borrowed from French, describes a sense of irritation and boredom. Emerson uses this word to describe how when we meet new people, earthly annoyances seem to disappear.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  67. As a renowned lecturer, Emerson was masterful at appealing to his audience’s emotions. Here, he employs hypophora, whereby he poses a series of rhetorical questions and then follows them up with an immediate answer. The questions he poses illustrate how friendship allows him to harness a more sensual connection with another person (“jets of affection,” “a just and firm encounter of two”) and his response demonstrates how friendship allows him to transcend all temporal sensation (“the earth is metamorphosed; there is no winter and no night”).

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  68. By personifying the negative qualities of “vulgarity, ignorance, misapprehension” as “old acquaintances,” Emerson further describes how friendships can wane with time. The sense of mystery and surprise surrounding a stranger transforms into disinterest as soon as that stranger becomes a friend. In turn, the visceral excitement of meeting a stranger, exemplified through the palpitating heart, diminishes entirely.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  69. While at first, Emerson seems to describe the positive qualities of friendship, here the essay explores one of friendship’s major paradoxes: while the forming of friendships may stir one’s excitement, the maintenance of friendship can easily deteriorate the more someone gets to know another. As Emerson makes clear throughout the essay, there is a fine line that delineates when friendships begin to turn sour.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  70. Words and phrases like “palpitation” and “uneasiness betwixt pleasure and pain” illustrate how the process of forming friendships with strangers is one of trepidation as well as invigoration. This hesitancy and uneasiness stimulates the whole body with a visceral response that “invades all the hearts of a household.”

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  71. Here, Emerson establishes the importance of letter-writing, or epistolary communication, in creating a strong foundation between friends. Using juxtaposing images, Emerson compares the scholar, who broods unproductively at his desk, with friends who are overcome with “troops of gentle thoughts” that inform and enliven their conversations.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  72. Emerson posits that both in literary and in day-to-day speech, the qualities of friendship are similar to the “material effects of fire,” a simile that evokes a mixed sense of suddenness and contemplation. Emerson finds beauty, or “sweetness,” in all types of friendship, from its passionate to its reflective incarnations.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  73. Although later rejected, Platonian physics claimed that the “eye-beam” generated sight from the eye. Here, Emerson speaks to the shared desire for unity within a community. He calls on readers to observe “these wandering eye-beams” who rejoice and find pleasure in human connectedness.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  74. In this simile, Emerson describes “love like a fine ether.” The noun “ether” refers to a rare element believed to fill the upper regions of space or the heavens. By juxtaposing the imagery of the east winds against the ether of love, Emerson suggests that while selfishness is a corporeal trait, love is a godlike, celestial quality that inhabits the far reaches of heaven.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  75. In literary and biblical symbolism, the “east winds” conjure an image of extreme frigidity and harshness. Through this opening paragraph, Emerson likens the pervasiveness of selfishness as the “east wind” that sweeps through and takes hold of society.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  76. Although rarely used today, the word “maugre” means “in spite of.” The two stems of the word mau and gré demonstrate a paradoxical relationship between “evil” and “grace,” translated respectively. In this context, Emerson begins to lay out the paradoxes of society, that despite the “selfishness… [of] the world,” love still exists.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff
  77. From the outset, Emerson pulls the reader into his essay with the inclusive pronoun “we.” Through this rhetorical device, Emerson immediately connects to readers at a personal level by invoking shared, communal values. He immediately establishes a common belief that both he and readers may hold true: individuals are inherently kind and good.

    — Tess, Owl Eyes Staff